Re: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.

[Marshall Eubanks <tme at multicasttech.com>]

Hello;

On Mar 27, 2006, at 11:13 PM, Anthony G. Atkielski wrote:

> Keith Moore writes:
>
> > NAT is a dead end.  If the Internet does not develop a way to  
> > obsolete
> > NAT, the Internet will die.
>
> I hardly think so, but in any case, the solution is pretty simple:
> give out IP addresses for free, instead of charging an arm and a leg
> for anything other than a single address.  As long as ISPs won't
> provide multiple addresses, or won't provide them except at
> unreasonably high prices, NAT will remain.

This is connected to IPv6 address assignment policies at your friendly
local RIR. I would urge that people who are interested in this issue in
the ARIN region join the PPML mailing list and even consider coming the
Montreal ARIN meeting next month. There are two proposals coming up,  
2005-1 and
2006-4, which would both relax the assignment of PI IPv6 space.

Regards
Marshall Eubanks

> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf