Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Reality (was RE: Stupid NAT tricks and how to stop them.)



Michel Py wrote:
> That being said, I do acknowledge that larger companies such as global
> ISPs do have a problem with the RFC1918 space being too small. This
> brings the debate of what to do with class E, either make it extended
> private space or make it global unicast.
>   

I think we bite the bullet and go to IPv6.  Screwing around with Class E
address space at this late date is counterproductive.  Say what you will
about v6.  It *does* have more bits.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.