Re: IPv6 Subsets?

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

You might also want to look at RFC 4294
(IPv6 Node Requirements).

   Brian

Juha Wiljakka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My apologies, the previous message was sent all too early by mistake...
>
> What I ment to say, you might want to have a look at RFC3316. 3GPP is
> using it as a reference for Release 5 (and onwards) cellular hosts. My
> personal view is that mobile devices which have IPv6 stack (well, that
> is typically dual IPv4/IPv6 stack...) implemented according to it
> "implement IPv6".
>
> Best Regards,
>                          Juha W.
>
>
> > On 4/19/06, Timothy J. Salo <salo at saloits.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, Ok, I probably haven't been paying attention, but...
> > >
> > > If a device implements a subset of IPv6, (e.g., no IPsec, no mobile
> > > IP), is it generally understood that this device "implements IPv6"?
> > >
> > > Has a standard subset of IPv6 been defined for very low-end devices
> > > that simply can't implement a full IPv6?
> > >
> > > As far as I can tell, we are at least informally moving towards
> > > IPv6-over-some-oddball-medium solutions that only implement a subset
> > > of IPv6, but it is not clear to me that they are always the same subset.
> > > It is also not clear to me whether this matters much.
> > >
> > > -tjs
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ietf mailing list
> > > Ietf at ietf.org
> > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf