![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
...
Robert Sayre wrote: > I am skeptical that Atompub will get any work done, > since I believe they have inaccurately identified the cause of their > problems
We have an appeals process for good reasons, and you should certainly not apologize for starting to use it.
Here are this week's posting stats for the Atompub WG list in question:
http://www.imc.org/atom-protocol/mail-archive/msg04949.html
I wonder if the atompub chairs would call that "absurd".
--
Robert Sayre
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.