RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [TLS] Review of draft-housley-tls-authz-extns-05
Right. I am proposing the addition of "(Informative)" after the
KeyNote section title. Also, I proposed assigning the KeyNote code
point from the "specification required" set of numbers instead of the
set that is associated with standards track documents.
Russ
At 11:07 AM 5/24/2006, Stephen Kent wrote:
Russ,
I concur with Pasi's observations. I don't recall seeing a similar
structure in an RFC, where a part is informative, in what is
otherwise a standards track document.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.