Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?

[Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com>]

Sam - I see where the nea BOF was more-or-less associated with the Internet
Area at IETF 65.  Do you expect that nea would (if eventually chartered)
land in Internet or Security?

- Ralph


On 5/26/06 10:58 AM, "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu> wrote:

>>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com> writes:
> 
>     Ralph> What is the current state of the nea WG?  I don't see it
>     Ralph> listed at http://ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html
> 
> It had a BOF at the last IETF.
> 
> It seems highly likely it will either have a proposed WG or BOF again.
> (Russ and I have received both a charter and a BOF proposal)
> 
> Russ is shepherding the effort.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





n <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
Message-ID: <C09C97DC.188ED%rdroms at cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
Thread-Index: AcaA2aHz4GclKezMEdqubgARJOT6eg==
In-Reply-To: <tsl1wugltn2.fsf at cz.mit.edu>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 May 2006 15:32:43.0329 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[A18D5310:01C680D9]
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=684; t=1148657566; x=1149521566;
	c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim8001;
	h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version;
	d=cisco.com; i=rdroms at cisco.com;
	z=From:Ralph=20Droms=20<rdroms at cisco.com>
	|Subject:Re=3A=20The=20Emperor=20Has=20No=20Clothes=3A=20Is=20PANA=20actually=20u
	seful?;
	X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3Dux9lmFuKloCPXIvLtp9wP7EAE2I=3D;
	b=QKwcRtQIdpdy3r5W8EW/SIMJ/0ll+SW0nLGlCctFAhRFthHAK32uVS9t8b43wL7VEi52vvSU
	gAySasg0vzsNkmkwzyoMmmeqrEmRA/dt4kGq0dE69EyEiXsbwJ7oN0Yy;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-8.cisco.com; header.From=rdroms at cisco.com;
	dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; ); 
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: The Emperor Has No Clothes: Is PANA actually useful?
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

Sam - I see where the nea BOF was more-or-less associated with the Internet
Area at IETF 65.  Do you expect that nea would (if eventually chartered)
land in Internet or Security?

- Ralph


On 5/26/06 10:58 AM, "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu> wrote:

>>>>>> "Ralph" == Ralph Droms <rdroms at cisco.com> writes:
> 
>     Ralph> What is the current state of the nea WG?  I don't see it
>     Ralph> listed at http://ietf.org/html.charters/wg-dir.html
> 
> It had a BOF at the last IETF.
> 
> It seems highly likely it will either have a proposed WG or BOF again.
> (Russ and I have received both a charter and a BOF proposal)
> 
> Russ is shepherding the effort.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf