RE: Comments on draft-iab-rfc-editor: IETF control

["Joel M. Halpern" <joel at stevecrocker.com>]

I would agree that folks should read all three documents.
However, as far as I can tell, Mike's concerns with 
draft-iab-rfc-editor all revolve around the status and support of 
independent contributions.
It would seem much more effective to resolve that view, and then 
discuss the exact wording in the charter to reflect what we have 
agreed we want.

Yours,
Joel M. Halpern

At 12:40 PM 6/11/2006, Margaret Wasserman wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> I don't think that the document that Mike and I have been discussing is the
> same one that you're talking about...
>
> The one we've been discussing is draft-iab-rfc-editor-00.txt, which is an
> RFC Editor charter proposed by the IAB, with Leslie Daigle acting as editor.
>
> The document that you are discussing is, presumably,
> draft-klensin-rfc-independent-02.txt.  That is a proposal from John Klensin
> to refine the RFC Editor individual submissions path.
>
> Another pertinent draft in this area is draft-mankin-pub-req-08.txt, which
> is the result of an IETF effort to define our requirements for technical
> publication of IETF documents (part of what the RFC editor currently does),
> written by Allison Mankin and Stephen Hayes.  There have been BOFs held on
> this topic, and there may be a separate mailing list for discussion of this
> work.
>
> These documents are all related to each other, and people who are interested
> in this topic should probably read all three of them.
>
> Margaret


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf