Re: xml2rfc improvements (was: Re: Image attachments to ASCII RFCs)

["Bill Fenner" <fenner at gmail.com>]

On 6/20/06, Ned Freed <ned.freed at mrochek.com> wrote:
> [jck:]
> > ... I like a feature of those system
> > that you didn't mention (the ability to insert comments whose
> > appearance in the output can easily turned on and off.  <cref>
> > and some processing options comes close, but isn't quite the
> > same).
>
> IMO this is something that needs to be added to xml2rfc. It is very common to
> have text of various sorts in drafts that has no business being in the final
> RFC, and the current mechanisms for controlling this are a bit primitive.
>
> Consider this a vote for some added functionality in xml2rfc to cover
> this case.

Can you be more specific about what the requirements are?  The xml2rfc
maintainers are (rightly, IMO) reluctant to add features
speculatively.  cref exists for this purpose, but doesn't fit your
needs because _____?

Thanks,
 Bill

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf