Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: are we willing to do change how we do discussions in IETF? (was: moving from hosts to sponsors)



On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:18:40 -0400
"Burger, Eric" <eburger at cantata.com> wrote:

> I would offer that in *some* groups the running code bar is reasonable.

I would have little objection to requiring running code as a test of feasibility of a new idea.  I would object strongly to an argument that just because someone has running code, means it's a good indication of adequacy of the protocol...DKIM is a great example of a poorly designed protocol that has been justified by running code.

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.