![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
On Jul 12, 2006, at 06:03, Dave Crocker wrote:4. Having a per-meeting special list has an obvious and reasonable basis.
However it makes each meeting's list a special case for IETF administration and
for attendees. Possible variations to consider:
a. Have the list name be permanent (such as "ietf-attendees") so that recipients can have a filing filter that they create one time.
If the spam filtering is good, or its subscribers-only... otherwise, per-meeting names with a known, simple pattern (ietf$MEETINGNUM-attendees?) might be better, if a little harder to match in some filter software.
d. Automatic subscription to a moderated, low-traffic announcement list, and optional subscription to a "chat" list for discussions of cookies, WCs, restaurants, etc.
hey - I like looking at the cookie discussion even when I'm not there!
Harald, who's on holiday this time - have a good one!
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.