Comments on draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Comments on draft-carpenter-newtrk-questions-00.txt



As Ted said during tonight's plenary, the draft and the plenary discussion seem to be proposing either making (presumably significant) changes in the standards process, or doing nothing, when there may be other possibilities. Ted mentioned that there were other things that could be done to improve the linkage between our specifications and running code. It seems to me that if efforts in that area succeed, we'd make it much easier to advance specifications, since we'd have more implementations.

I'd also like to note that our specifications are not atomic; advancing from PS to DS means showing at least two interworking implementations of every feature and option.
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and
conscientious stupidity.
--Martin Luther King, Jr.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.