Re: RFC Editor SOW Review

To: Stewart Bryant <stbryant at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 11:08:59 -0400
Cc: IAB <iab at ietf.org>, IETF Discussion <ietf at ietf.org>, techspec at ietf.org, IAOC <iaoc at ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <44B657C4.60102@cisco.com> (Stewart Bryant's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:25:08 +0100")
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <44B2497D.3060000@isoc.org> <44B657C4.60102@cisco.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

I do not support Stewart's comment.

However I will note that our current process requires the rfc-editor
to accept ASCII input along with non-normative PDF or PostScript
input.  The SOW should reflect this current practice.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Brian E Carpenter

References:
- RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Ray Pelletier
- Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
  - From: Stewart Bryant

Prev by Date: Re: Currency Exchange in Montreal
Next by Date: Room Rates RE: Meetings in other regions
Previous by thread: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Next by thread: Re: RFC Editor SOW Review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: RFC Editor SOW Review

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.