Re: Meetings in other regions

[Dave Cridland <dave at cridland.net>]

On Mon Jul 17 16:10:49 2006, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 17-jul-2006, at 16:56, Melinda Shore wrote:
> > > Although I did jabber scribing for a couple of sessions the past 
> > > week
> > > I don't see all that much value in doing that: the audio feeds are
> > > much more useful for following what's going on.
>
> > As the number of meeting groups grow and the meetings become more
> > densely packed, the jabber transcripts are useful for following
> > what's going on in a meeting you're not in, as well as providing
> > feedback.
>
> Yes, I've heard that before.
Also, you can't always get the audio, and if often cuts, and is 
generally quite noisy, and people tend to forget to come to 
microphones in the heat of the moment.

> > But anyway, if we're going to continue to allow the meetings
> > to grow in significance (as a matter of process) it seems to me
> > that the remote participation tools become more important, not
> > less important.
>
> Did I say it should become less important? I don't see how the  
> meetings are growing in significance, though.

I think Melinda's intention was to suggest that they ought to be.

Dave.
--
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave at cridland.net - xmpp:dwd at jabber.org
 - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
 - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf