Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

 
  *> > 
  *> >>And I'd be reasonably happy if we specified 'any version of rsync greater
  *> >>than X.Y.Z', or some such.  The current debian stable version (2.6.4-6)
  *> >>would work for me.
  *> > 
  *> > Saying "rsync version 2.6 or later" works for me, as long as we 
  *> > understand the "can't eat our own dogfood" aspect of this requirement.
  *> 

A contractual requirement at this level of detail seems totally
crazy.

Bob Braden

  *> Works for me.
  *> 
  *> 
  *> 	Henrik
  *> 
  *> _______________________________________________
  *> Ietf mailing list
  *> Ietf at ietf.org
  *> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
  *> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.