Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request



Hi Bob,

>   *> > 
>   *> >>And I'd be reasonably happy if we specified 'any version of rsync greater
>   *> >>than X.Y.Z', or some such.  The current debian stable version (2.6.4-6)
>   *> >>would work for me.
>   *> > 
>   *> > Saying "rsync version 2.6 or later" works for me, as long as we 
>   *> > understand the "can't eat our own dogfood" aspect of this requirement.
>   *> 
> 
> A contractual requirement at this level of detail seems totally
> crazy.

So how would you specify the requirement to provide rsync
functionality in the SOW?


	Henrik


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.