Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request



> Ok.  So I'm not sure what you propose here - should we not require
> rsync and ftp mirroring capability, or should we ask for it, and not
> specify chapter and verse regarding version etc.?  I'd certainly be
> very unhappy completely abandoning the rsync capability.

IMO, the SOW should have some wording that requires/implies that
information available via web pages must also be provided in a
mirror-friendly way. The principle is that that the info can be easily
be replicated on mirror servers using standard tools in a way that
minimizes data transfer by distinguishing which pages have changed and
which have not.

Mentioning specific tools, if needed, should be in an "e.g." clause,
to make clear they are examples but not hard requirements.

The actual details would presumably be sorted out be reasonable people
on both ends.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.