Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]

To: todd glassey <tglassey at earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:34:07 +0200
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-6.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten at us.ibm.com>, Pete Resnick <presnick at qualcomm.com>, Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>, Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu>, ietf at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=414; t=1153424051; x=1154288051; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim6002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20Response=20to=20the=20Appeal=20by=20[...]; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DFnDj4dNdvK5HAc6kMduuK8IsAM8=3D; b=BMqZSXFsc5CoXNvwghQAYGeofUEVlWPtMXY6K/LTph1nlTifCK4Rwc3mcKCfy8I36O8t9Ctf zXR5Ok6bgiNKjUsPUorxjtaHhgog4t/mk0jZNMcTaZp7TAzFoezHpqFS;
In-reply-to: <020a01c6ac29$e2e7b370$1430f604@home.glassey.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <E1G008B-0004Me-5W@ietf.org> <p07000c08c0e148f01132@[216.43.25.67]><44BBDC72.3C43@xyzzy.claranet.de><p07000c13c0e1b08f5a5a@[216.43.25.67]><44BCA629.5070403@zurich.ibm.com><200607191302.k6JD2L10024228@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com><E1G008B-0004Me-5W@ietf.org> <p07000c08c0e148f01132@[216.43.25.67]><44BBDC72.3C43@xyzzy.claranet.de><p07000c13c0e1b08f5a5a@[216.43.25.67]><44BCA629.5070403@zurich.ibm.com><p07000c18c0e29583032c@[216.43.25.67]> <tslzmf4nwdz.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <p07000c01c0e56e7b51c0@[10.0.2.2]> <020a01c6ac29$e2e7b370$1430f604@home.glassey.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530)

todd glassey wrote:
> That requires a policy and approval by the ISOC - this is one of the onerous
> failings of the ISOC as well.... that it let the IETF define its own
> contractual processes and their recourse models.
>
>   

The IETF is a community trust, and the ISOC was formed to maintain that
trust.  The IETF let itself be governed by the ISOC on that basis, not
the other way around.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: Response to the Appeal by JFC Morfin dated 2006-02-17
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Frank Ellermann
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Thomas Narten
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Pete Resnick
- Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
  - From: Pete Resnick

Prev by Date: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
Next by Date: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
Previous by thread: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
Next by thread: Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Response to the Appeal by [...]

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.