 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dave Crocker wrote: ... > And that leads to the basic question of professional editing. As I've noted > before, my recent experience with the RFC Editor's editors was quite good. They > definitely improved the writing in the document. > > However, such an editorial effort it expensive and I do not understand why this > additional expense is needed. It was not needed for 25 or so years. And now we > are more sensitive to expenses. The set of people writing docs has increased substantially. The writing skills of that set have diversified, and the pool of potential support has increased. It seems like the two mutually support the use of professional editing. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.