Re: netwrk stuff

To: David Harrington <ietfdbh at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: netwrk stuff
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:27:41 -0700
Cc: 'IETF Discussion' <ietf at ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <03bc01c6acd5$30e31dc0$0400a8c0@china.huawei.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <03bc01c6acd5$30e31dc0$0400a8c0@china.huawei.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516)

David Harrington wrote:
> Why not start everything at Experimental, and if it gains market
> success then it moves to Full. 

why not make the smallest change we can, rather than alter the existing, basic
mechanism for entering standards track (and, for that matter, why not preserve
the use of labels that already have a valid role)?

d/
-- 

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Prev by Date: Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
Next by Date: Re: RFC Editor Function SOW Review
Previous by thread: Re: netwrk stuff
Next by thread: Re: netwrk stuff
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: netwrk stuff

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.