Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

To: Henrik Levkowetz <henrik at levkowetz.com>
Subject: Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
From: Eliot Lear <lear at cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 09:21:08 +0200
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: iad at ietf.org, iab at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org, iaoc at ietf.org, paul.hoffman at vpnc.org, Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>, iesg at ietf.org
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=326; t=1153552876; x=1154416876; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=From:Eliot=20Lear=20<lear@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20RFC=20Editor=20RFP=20Review=20Request; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DmDbKAVzOWa/3wRN63bvRbfWzkpE=3D; b=EcBz3mtoktR+JOj/rMRU6OzjOdK4zsWaudkZnaIL06ICISAJs56iTe5ks4JVVRayY/iYAwUb q0RXiBSAIrkJgmedKVDoRzVAJCQsLTb8pY31HZZ4yiDh3EPjMLN6nx0Q;
In-reply-to: <44BD71E0.5030005@levkowetz.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200607182242.PAA05134@gra.isi.edu> <44BD71E0.5030005@levkowetz.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Macintosh/20060530)

Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
> So how would you specify the requirement to provide rsync
> functionality in the SOW?
>
>   

I would think you would say something like, "The RFC Editor shall make
available an archive of RFCs in ways most convenient to both active
participants and casual observers" and leave it at that. 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  - From: todd glassey

References:
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  - From: Bob Braden
- Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
  - From: Henrik Levkowetz

Prev by Date: Re: San Diego (was RE: Meetings in other regions)
Next by Date: Out of Office AutoReply: Returned mail: Data format error
Previous by thread: No code of conduct. No "hold-harmless" sections of the IETF's participation agreements has an interesting effect...
Next by thread: Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.