Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request




Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
...
> I agree that things would be simpler if we could come up with a way to
> do things that didn't require figuring out the answer.  Unfortunately,
> I'm not convinced we can.  Before I go any further, let me point out
> that I have no reason to believe that ISI will act other than in good
> faith and in accordance with the best interests of the Internet. 

s/ISI/IESG/, and for that matter, IETF.

I don't see how adding disclaimers of documents that are not generated
in nor declared as related to the IETF requires a disclaimer. I don't
think adding that statement - which *will* have a chilling effect on
independent submissions - is in the best interest of the Internet.

Joe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.