Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Request

[John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>]

--On Thursday, 27 July, 2006 11:04 -0700 Todd Glassey
<tglassey at earthlink.net> wrote:

> JCK
> Lets ask Jorge if the Final RFP is different from interim
> RFP's then dont all parties have to be given proper review and
> response time to the final version? lest they recieve less
> access or are not favorites in the bidding-contract
> acquisition process?

Todd, I think you are wasting everyone's time here.  There are
no "interim RFPs", there are merely drafts for [IETF] community
review and comments.  I presume that, once the final RFP is
issued (July 31 is the current target if I remember the
schedule), all parties will have until the submission deadline
to do whatever they will do with it.   Clearly, if the final RFP
were issued, and then some update were to appear in mid-August
that changed the terms and conditions in a significant way, that
would be bad news.  But I don't think anyone has proposed that.

    john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf