Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque
- To: lear at cisco.com
- Subject: Re: [INDEP] Re: [IAOC] Re: RFC Editor RFP Review Reque
- From: Bob Braden <braden at ISI.EDU>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: leslie at thinkingcat.com, iad at ietf.org, ietf at ietf.org, mankin at psg.com, iaoc at ietf.org, hardie at qualcomm.com, john-ietf at jck.com, independent at ietf.org
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Eliot,
You wrote:
*>
*> I would first see independent submissions abolished altogether. There
*> are many publishing outlets. This is not the 1970s. The term RFC has
*> been appropriated by the IETF community.
*>
Oh, really? That statement makes me want to fire up a lawyer.
Bob Braden
*> Eliot
*>
*> _______________________________________________
*> INDEPENDENT mailing list
*> INDEPENDENT at ietf.org
*> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/independent
*>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.