Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Weekly posting summary for ietf at ietf.org



Total of 26 messages in the last 7 days.
 
script run at: Fri Aug  4 00:03:02 EDT 2006
 
    Messages   |      Bytes        | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
 15.38% |    4 | 20.06% |    29889 | tglassey at earthlink.net
  7.69% |    2 |  6.07% |     9049 | nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de
  7.69% |    2 |  5.98% |     8908 | braden at isi.edu
  3.85% |    1 |  8.68% |    12925 | julian.reschke at gmx.de
  3.85% |    1 |  5.47% |     8153 | jordi.palet at consulintel.es
  3.85% |    1 |  5.05% |     7524 | eric.gray at marconi.com
  3.85% |    1 |  4.40% |     6558 | narten at us.ibm.com
  3.85% |    1 |  4.19% |     6247 | lmahan at designwest.com
  3.85% |    1 |  3.82% |     5687 | satya_prasad.nemana at alcatel.com
  3.85% |    1 |  3.72% |     5545 | tytso at mit.edu
  3.85% |    1 |  3.49% |     5195 | sisyphus at dial.pipex.com
  3.85% |    1 |  3.36% |     5006 | housley at vigilsec.com
  3.85% |    1 |  3.34% |     4969 | rpelletier at isoc.org
  3.85% |    1 |  3.12% |     4650 | ietf at andybierman.com
  3.85% |    1 |  3.03% |     4521 | ned.freed at mrochek.com
  3.85% |    1 |  2.95% |     4402 | renatoftato at yahoo.com
  3.85% |    1 |  2.76% |     4118 | sandy at weijax.com
  3.85% |    1 |  2.75% |     4101 | olaf at nlnetlabs.nl
  3.85% |    1 |  2.61% |     3891 | jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu
  3.85% |    1 |  2.57% |     3830 | dhc2 at dcrocker.net
  3.85% |    1 |  2.56% |     3817 | jabley at ca.afilias.info
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
100.00% |   26 |100.00% |   148985 | Total

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.