![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I'd like to ask for comment on draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions-01.txt.
The reason it was written in this particular form is that the IETF has never really set down its procedures for how extensions to IETF protocols should be handled, if they originate outside the IETF. It's a practical problem that comes up quite frequently.
The draft intentionally doesn't talk about technical design aspects of extensions - there is another draft on that topic in the works.
Brian
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.