Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
Dave Crocker wrote:
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Because the IESG believed that specifying an image format
as an audio subtype was to be discouraged, but should be documented
for reference.
Historically, "documenting for reference" produces an Informational status,
rather than Historic.
Yes, and the idea was to make a stronger statement than "for reference".
iirc, we considered briefly approving it for Informational and then
immediately reclassifying it as Historic. But that seemed silly.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
