Re: RFC 4612 - historic status
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: RFC 4612 - historic status



Paul E. Jones wrote:
I wonder how customers might react to seeing new gateway hardware produced
utilizing "historic" RFCs.  What does that mean?
  

The statement from the IESG is that it means you did something you ought not to have done.  I believe we are now quibbling over the word "audio".  What I don't understand is why you didn't have this discussion with the RAI and APP folk before the document was released and come up with a mutually agreeable alternative.  A spirit of cooperation would demand no less, right?

Eliot
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.