Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

[Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>]

IMHO, there's something fundamentally wrong with any IETF working
group that's not willing to learn about IPv6.  IPv6 is not a specialized
topic, it's the layer common to all parts of the emerging Internet.
And there's little point in standardizing anything new that only works
on IPv4.  I'd go so far as to say that any new protocol that doesn't
support IPv6 has significant "known technical omissions" that should 
make its approval as a Proposed Standard seriously in doubt.

Keith

> This topic has come up in the past -- the last time I recall it being a 
> significant issue was IETF 63 in Paris, France.  On multiple occasions 
> since then we have asked for volunteers with IPv6 expertise to help 
> complete the IPv6 bits of this I-D.  Unfortunately, we have gotten 
> little to no response.   Do you wish to help out with this?  Or, can you 
> provide a pointer to folks in the IPv6 world that can take a look at 
> this doc and help out?


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf