![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Hi.
Regards, Elwyn
Pekka,
This topic has come up in the past -- the last time I recall it being a significant issue was IETF 63 in Paris, France. On multiple occasions since then we have asked for volunteers with IPv6 expertise to help complete the IPv6 bits of this I-D. Unfortunately, we have gotten little to no response. Do you wish to help out with this? Or, can you provide a pointer to folks in the IPv6 world that can take a look at this doc and help out?
Thanks,
-shane
Pekka Savola wrote:On Wed, 16 Aug 2006, Internet-Drafts at ietf.org wrote:A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts...
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Layer 2 Virtual Private Networks Working Group of the IETF.
Title : ARP Mediation for IP Interworking of Layer 2 VPN Author(s) : H. Shah, et al. Filename : draft-ietf-l2vpn-arp-mediation-07.txt Pages : 21 Date : 2006-8-16The VPWS service [L2VPN-FRM] provides point-to-point connections between pairs of Customer Edge (CE) devices. It does so by binding two Attachment Circuits (each connecting a CE device with a Provider Edge, PE, device) to a pseudowire (connecting the two PEs). In general, the Attachment Circuits must be of the same technology (e.g., both Ethernet, both ATM), and the pseudowire must carry the frames of that technology. However, if it is known that the frames' payload consists solely of IP datagrams, it is possible to provide a point-to-point connection in which the pseudowire connects Attachment Circuits of different technologies. This requires the PEs to perform a function known as "ARP Mediation". ARP Mediation refers to the process of resolving Layer 2 addresses when different resolution protocols are used on either Attachment Circuit. The methods described in this document are applicable even when the CEs run a routing protocol between them, as long as the routing protocol runs over IP.
The document says,
10. IPV6 Considerations
The support for IPV6 is not addressed in this draft and is for future study.
This needs to be addressed throughout the document.
The whole point of L2VPNs (IMHO) is that it's agnostic of what protocols users run above L2. Users depend on a transparent L2 service model and this model breaks that assumption.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.