Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 13:02:44 -0400
Cc: l2vpn at ietf.org, shane at castlepoint.net, pekkas at netcore.fi, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2CD4@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2CD4@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>

> You appear to beleive that the only reason someone might disagree with you is ignorance. 

That's ridiculous.  Arrogance is another reason.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
Next by Date: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
Previous by thread: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
Next by thread: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.