Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only



Title: Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

I thought that about your post but thought it might be impolite to mention.

Sent from my GoodLink Wireless Handheld (www.good.com)

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Keith Moore [mailto:moore at cs.utk.edu]
Sent:   Friday, August 18, 2006 10:01 AM Pacific Standard Time
To:     Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Cc:     shane at castlepoint.net; l2vpn at ietf.org; pekkas at netcore.fi; ietf at ietf.org
Subject:        Re: L2VPNs must not be IP(v4)-only

> You appear to beleive that the only reason someone might disagree with you is ignorance.

That's ridiculous.  Arrogance is another reason.

Keith

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.