Re: Last Call: 'Calendaring Extensions to WebDAV (CalDAV)' to Proposed Standard (draft-dusseault-caldav)

[Julian Reschke <julian.reschke at gmx.de>]

Bernard Desruisseaux schrieb:
> > 2) In 
> > <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-dusseault-caldav-14.html#rfc.section.5.2.1> 
> > you refer to Section 12.4.1, which in RFC2518 describes the DAV:source 
> > property. The equivalent of 12.4.1 in RFC2518bis does not exist in 
> > RFC2518, so you can't refer to it (thus you may have to either repeat 
> > it, or refer to RFC3253 or RFC3744 instead). Same for subsequent 
> > references to that Section.
>
> Actually, the draft is making reference to "Section 12.14.1 of [RFC2518]"

Right, sorry.

> which describes the DAV:allprop XML element. Previously, the draft was
> making reference to "Section 14.2 of [I-D.ietf-webdav-rfc2518bis]" which
> also describes the DAV:allprop XML element. I believe we are fine here.

Yes, but the difference here is that RFC2518bis changed the meaning of 
DAV:allprop from "all properties" to "all dead properties and the live 
properties defined by RFC2518bis". Thus, if CalDAV doesn't want its live 
properties to be returned, it can't say "DAV:allprop as defined by 
RFC2518"...

Best regards, Julian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf