Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

James Galvin wrote:
> > First .. the instant there was a problem the IETF community
> > should have been notified in full on this list.
>
> Perhaps, in this particular case, but in general the NOMCOM operates 
> under the veil of confidentiality. 

Specifically, the process of selecting the nomcom does *not*.


 Historically that veil has covered
> most everything about the NOMCOM (in spite of the "leakage"), and I 
> would not expect that to change any time soon.

The process of selecting the nomcom has been fully public for a very 
long time.

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf