Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...

[Dave Crocker <dhc2 at dcrocker.net>]

> Therefore, I propose the following:
>
> (1) Andrew's decision stands.  Under RFC 3777, the only recourse available
...
> (2) Text is added to the next version of the selection process to addresss

No one has expressed a concern that there was an attempt, here, to game 
the process, or that re-doing selection will actually produce a 
problematic nomcom membership.  So either retaining the original list or 
re-doing the selections results in an acceptable set of nomcom members.

The wastefulness and disruption of unnecessarily re-doing selection is 
unfortunate, but hardly fatal.

Creating better text for the future is certainly a good idea.

And, yes, this is a long-winded version of:

   +1

d/
--

  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf