Re: NOMCOM term limits... Re: Now there seems to be lack of communicaiton here...

[John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>]

--On Tuesday, September 05, 2006 6:11 AM -0700 todd glassey 
<tglassey at earthlink.net> wrote:

> I originally said two...and would prefer that.
>
> What I am saying is that there should be a total of two or
> three instances as a NOMCOM candidate and that is a much
> different statement than figuring who is in office now and who
> is eligible...As to what it prevents-career Internet Standards
> jockey's.
>
> And since the purpose is to keep the IETF honest, I want the
> same term limits for any and all IETF positions, including the
> TRUST as well.
>
> By the way - has anyone seen a Business Plan for the TRUST and
> what it is supposed to do? I don't mean some fictional set of
> ideas - I mean the business plan. I want to see exactly what
> the Trust is responsible for and how its to be measured,

Todd,

Term limit ideas for IESG, IAB, and others, and even a 
suggestion that no one should be able to serve on consecutive 
Nomcoms, have been floated multiple times and have gone nowhere. 
I believe the latest attempt was as part of 
draft-klensin-nomcom-term-01.txt, which appears to be going 
nowhere as well.

If you have a proposal here, I recommend that you make it in the 
form of an Internet Draft that is specific enough that people 
can actually comment on, or respond to, it.    And, since 
proposals that have been fairly strongly motivated haven't even 
progressed to a WG review or IETF Last Call, I recommend that 
you justify your preferences in someone more detail than saying 
"I want".  In this area, there is clear evidence that no one 
cares about what you want or, for that matter, what I want.

Just my opinion.
   john


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf