feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license))
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
feed-license-08 (was: Last Call: 'Atom License Extension' to Experimental RFC (draft-snell-atompub-feed-license))
James M Snell wrote:
> a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287.
Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered
by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding".
How about "might be not legally binding" ? "Are not" sounds
like "forget it".
Frank (IANAL)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
