Re: feed-license-08

[James M Snell <jasnell at gmail.com>]

Hello Frank,

Yes, there has been some feedback and additional discussion posted to
the atom-syntax list, part of which covers this new section.  That forum
would likely be the best place to discuss.  That said, however, good
suggestion.  Thank you for taking a look.

- James

Frank Ellermann wrote:
> James M Snell wrote:
> 
>> a primary goal of mine is to remain consistent with rfc4287.
> 
> Hi, I've seen the "post last call" update (draft -08) triggered
> by the GenArt review, where you say "are not legally binding".
> 
> How about "might be not legally binding" ?  "Are not" sounds
> like "forget it".
> 
> Frank (IANAL)
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf