Re: Last Call: 'Procedures for protocol extensions and variations' to BCP (draft-carpenter-protocol-extensions)

[Frank Ellermann <nobody at xyzzy.claranet.de>]

Sam Hartman wrote:

 [definition of interoperability] 
> As discussed in a recent IESG appeal, it's not clear that
> we have a clear statement of our interoperability goals.
> There's some text in section 4 of RFC 2026, but we seem to
> actually want to go farther than that text.
[...]
> If people would find this useful I can try to write text.

If you have something in mind, sure, it would be very useful.
And not necessarily limited to Brian's draft, it's also
related to http://article.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.general/19269

Frank



_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf