Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some



Todd,

As one of the randoms (and speaking for nobody but myself)...

The facts remain - most IETF WG participants have no idea what is going on
here - and that is not their fault - its the fault of the design of the IETF

Personally I've no huge problem with the nomcom.

However, if you feel it needs to change, then the usual method would
be to write two drafts.  The first a problem statement describing the
issues with the current system, and the second a proposal of how to
change it.  That way there is something concrete to discuss.

If people have no idea what is going on, one of the reasons could be
because it is spread out over several dozen email messages rather than
a couple of focused documents.

YES. In fact I ran a small survey and got a 97% YES response. 97%...

I guess this is relatively meaningless without a context into the community from which the responses were received.

All the best,
Rob

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.