Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?

To: "Jefsey_Morfin" <jefsey at jefsey.com>
Subject: Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
From: Carl Malamud <carl at media.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: Sam Hartman <hartmans at mit.edu>, Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>, ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <7.0.1.0.2.20060911200813.0342dc98@jefsey.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Center for American Progress

> IMHO, fighting the messenger is not the proper solution to the 
> problem. 

The messenger accused the IETF chair of lying.  That is totally
inappropriate behavior.

Carl

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Please make the madness stop (was: a whole bunch of flames)
  - From: Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  - From: Jefsey_Morfin

References:
- Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
  - From: Jefsey_Morfin

Prev by Date: Re: Crisis of Faith - was Re: Adjusting the Nomcom process
Next by Date: Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
Previous by thread: Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
Next by thread: Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Re: Todd Glassey ban -- pretty please?

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.