Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some

To: ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 16:42:37 +0200
In-reply-to: <20060914123711.GB8964@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
References: <01a901c6d7f2$ed2a2ee0$010aa8c0@home.glassey.com> <20060914123711.GB8964@login.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Tim Chown wrote:

Isn't he barred from posting here?


If by "he" you mean Dean Anderson, yes.

As I observed, the delete key is handy.

    Brian

On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 07:51:27PM -0700, todd glassey wrote:
I am forwarding this on behalf of Dean Anderson.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  - From: todd glassey
- Re: Fw: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process rather than some
  - From: Tim Chown

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.