Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Facts, please, not handwaving [Re: Its about mandate RE: Why cant the IETF embrace an open Election Process]



Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> We could argue this interminably or you could simply grasp the nettle
>> and align theory with reality.
>
> It was clear in Montreal that there is no community consensus to spend
> effort on doing this, so we have closed down this avenue for now.

I'm sorry, Brian, but this answer is truly unacceptable.  Reality is
that our 3 step process is not functioning as documented.  We thought we
were fixing it in NEWTRK, but you shut down that group.  Please tell me
and the rest of the community what path you expect to correct the
error.  If you don't have a proposal I will have one of my own.

Eliot

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.