Re: draft-kolkman-appeal-support

On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 10:31:57AM +0200, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kolkman-appeal-support
> 
> ...it's just wrong.

I think he's got a good idea.  It maybe could use some tweaking.

The IETF should stop doing things that are not relevant to its
constituency and serve only to waste its (donated) time-dollars.

This includes but is not limited to: appeals from total nuts.

One perfectly acceptable tactic, which Olafur has codified in this
draft, is to limit appeals to only those made by mixed nuts.

I think it would be more productive to suggest alternative tactics
than to ask Olafur to withdraw his draft.  We would all like to
know what other options there are.

> I didn't try to find three "paying members" to
> support that opinion, and nobody else is "qualified" to support it :-(

...nor would you have had to.

-- 
ISC Training!  October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area,
covering topics from DNS to DDNS & DHCP.  Email training@isc.org.
-- 
David W. Hankins	"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer		you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.	-- Jack T. Hankins