![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Michael Thomas wrote:
John C Klensin wrote:...The only folks who need to look for supporters are those who have appealed before and whose appeals have been rejected as without merit.
Can an appeal be rejected with merit?
Certainly.
A simplistic created-on-the-spot example:
The IETF publishes RFC 8214, on "Lessons Learned About Hosting an IETF Social", whereupon Ima Complainer appeals specification 8.3.2a "Construction of Corkscrews" because it includes the verbage "Threads must be right-handed, ie, the screw must travel INTO the cork when the handle is turned clockwise."
Appeal one: "I represent Bob's Hardware Company (henceforth BHC), which has been making left-handed corkscrews for 300 years, and they work fine. All of our customers prefer them, saying that our tools are the best they have ever found. Why are you suddenly making our standard product 'non-standard'?"
Rejection of Appeal one: "The IESG has determined that BHC is a traditional supplier of tools designed specifically for left-handed users. As such, we find that BHC is an exception to the "general use" of these standards. The appeal has merit, but is rejected."
Appeal two: "Everyone in the IETF Social Planning Work Group has blue eyes, and as such cannot be trusted. Please push RFC 8214 back until we can get some brown-eyed engineers on this WG."
Rejection of Appeal two" "The IESG has reviewed several personality to eye color studies, and has been unable to find any correlation between eye color and integrity. The appeal is rejected as being without merit."
It might make sense to have a ruling something like, "any participant can appeal any IETF document or decision, with the following limit: The body appealed to may, at it's discretion, refuse to accept an appeal if the appealer has had more appeals rejected without merit than all other results."
This means that, if more than half of your appeals were RWOM, they _may_ refuse to hear you. Nothing keeps you from getting someone else to appeal for you. It's just that, if someone with no history does this for you, and it is RWOM, then they are 1 to 0, themselves.
Are we simply formalizing a reputation system here? Don't we have better things to do?
-- Unable to locate coffee. Operator halted.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.