Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>
Subject: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
From: Keith Moore <moore at cs.utk.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:11:45 -0400
Cc: ietf at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37DD5DE3@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD37DD5DE3@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909)

So you see your role as wrecking proposals rather than making constructive proposals of your own?


do you by any chance listen to Rush Limbaugh?


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Prev by Date: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Next by Date: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to ...
Previous by thread: RE: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Next by thread: Re: [Nea] UPDATED: WG Review: Network Endpoint Assessment (nea)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.