Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to BCP (draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)

[Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>]

My head is spinning.

The draft (ignoring 3683) restores 2418 and adds the extra powers
created by 3934. I've been told by the author of 3934 that removing
the powers created by 2418 was not intended (even though there is
no other way to read the words in 3934). So I think the question on
the table is: does the community want the union of the powers created
by 2418 and 3934?

I can certainly agree that 4633, for its lifetime, seems to grant
at least these powers. But of course if we go that way, this discussion
will be back again in a year.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf





2006 16:50:21 -0400
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com
	(d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49])
	by mtagate5.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k9PKo7xX089822;
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:50:07 GMT
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com
	[9.149.165.212])
	by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/NCO v8.1.1) with
	ESMTP id k9PKqoPW2953332; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:52:50 +0200
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP
	id k9PKo78i019321; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:50:07 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232])
	by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP
	id k9PKo6Oo019182; Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:50:06 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com ([9.4.210.31])
	by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA192332; 
	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:50:04 +0200
Message-ID: <453FCDFE.8060603 at zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:50:06 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc at zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ned Freed <ned.freed at mrochek.com>
References: <453F3F9E.6090703 at zurich.ibm.com>
	<E1Gb2rx-0006CC-5H at stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
	<10697.1161723581 at munnari.OZ.AU> <11155.1161782861 at munnari.OZ.AU>
	<1B5796D5CC86BE0521231CCF at p3.JCK.COM>
	<01M8RXBY0E6C0008CX at mauve.mrochek.com>
In-Reply-To: <01M8RXBY0E6C0008CX at mauve.mrochek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 1ac7cc0a4cd376402b85bc1961a86ac2
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf at jck.com>, iesg at ietf.org,
	Robert Elz <kre at munnari.OZ.AU>, ietf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Progressive Posting Rights Supsensions' to
	BCP	(draft-carpenter-rescind-3683)
X-BeenThere: ietf at ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf at ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
	<mailto:ietf-request at ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces at ietf.org

My head is spinning.

The draft (ignoring 3683) restores 2418 and adds the extra powers
created by 3934. I've been told by the author of 3934 that removing
the powers created by 2418 was not intended (even though there is
no other way to read the words in 3934). So I think the question on
the table is: does the community want the union of the powers created
by 2418 and 3934?

I can certainly agree that 4633, for its lifetime, seems to grant
at least these powers. But of course if we go that way, this discussion
will be back again in a year.

    Brian

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf