RE: References to XML 'documents'
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: References to XML 'documents'



The statements in this thread about errata are incorrect, 
at least as far as W3C specs are concerned.  For example, 
if you go to:

   http://www.w3.org/TR/xinclude/

you will see the text:

   Please refer to the errata for this document, which may 
   include normative corrections.

The word "errata" in the above links to:

   http://www.w3.org/2004/12/xinclude-errata

If you follow that link, you will find (evolving) errata 
which *do* apply to the latest version of the spec.

Misha


This email was sent to you by Reuters, the global news and information company. 
To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.