Re: WG Review: Recharter of Internet Emergency Preparedness (iepr ep)

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

At 04:29 PM 11/5/2006 -0800, Lars Eggert wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2006, at 16:06, King, Kimberly S. wrote:
> > On Nov 5, 2006, at 13:27, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > And I believe that the tsvwg is the right place to discuss where RSVP
> > > intersects with security.
> >
> > The point is that this work belongs here at the IETF, not which
> > working
> > group addresses a particular aspect.
>
> Note that I wrote:
>
> > TSVWG is the WG currently chartered for RSVP
> > maintenance, which I would see this falling under.
>
> I made no statement of where RSVP work should happen in the future,
> but having this work elsewhere would obviously require consensus at
> various levels.

didn't the IESG, about 18 months ago (it may be longer) write a letter to 
either ITU-T or ETSI  to stop attempting to extend RSVP, that it was 
supposed to be done in the IETF?

I seem to remember that event occuring, though I admit I don't remember the 
details; Allison Mankin would know, as should Jon Peterson.


> Lars
> --
> Lars Eggert                                     NEC Network Laboratories
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf