RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- To: "Fred Baker" <fred at cisco.com>
- Subject: RE: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
- From: "Dolly, Martin C, ALABS" <mdolly at att.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 11:33:04 -0600
- Cc: "Robert G. Cole" <robert.cole at jhuapl.edu>, ietf at ietf.org, ieprep at ietf.org, Scott Bradner <sob at harvard.edu>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf at mit.edu>, Pekka Savola <pekkas at netcore.fi>
- In-reply-to: <9CD3E405-C104-4B24-8479-DC4BB1022DE5@cisco.com>
- List-help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- Thread-index: AccEbJpPgur8RsZ/RkOsQcfuepLIBQAf/Ukg
- Thread-topic: [Ieprep] Re: WG Review: Recharter ofInternet Emergency Preparedness (ieprep)
WRT ETS:
1. Architecture and service definition/requirements is better fit in
ATIS, with some ITU work.
2. Refinement of requirements for definition of Internet protocols in
the IETF
3. ATIS Standards/Implementation requirements to further ensure
interworking/interoperability
Internet Protocol expertise is clearly here in the IETF, but by the same
token Service and deployed network architecture expertise is where the
service providers "actively" participate, which is ATIS (and where
needed the ITU).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions
of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.