RE: [ietf-dkim] Re: Last Call: 'DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM)Signatures' to Proposed Standard (draft-ietf-dkim-base)

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker at verisign.com>]

> From: Robert Elz [mailto:kre at munnari.OZ.AU] 

> I don't want to continue this, especially as I don't care 
> about this protocol, but ...


>   | In my book deployability trumps pretty much everything else.
> 
> It certainly is important, but being correct (ie: working) is probably
> a little more important...   Avoiding breaking other things is also
> more important.

Which is why the working group has had extensive discussions with the DNS Directorate on this topic. You will be glad to know that you need not worry about it.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf